Drakengard 3 final boss full#

But he at least knows that he exists and does a thing. Wolf Kanno is Nojima-san's natural enemy. Same goes for whenever people do not acknowledge the existence of people like Kazushige Nojima or Daisuke Watanabe. Because the credits are just decoration with made up names. And that person did EVERYTHING in the game. One person on youtube for the final boss of Drakengard 3 was like 'Yoko Taro or whoever composed this. And even worse, those fans do not even know that Taro is his first name. But that does not mean they make the entire game, let alone the most important parts of it. These people are incredibly important organs as Directors. Mentioning Taro Yoko now is like when people only knew the name 'Motomu Toriyama' for Final Fantasy XIII. But Nier 1 had a big advantage: The writers were Sawako Natori and Kikuchi Hana.

Drakengard 3 final boss full#

Other moments that hardly got exposition are torn apart by fans with their theories that they have read from other fans even though it is full of speculations and half o the game contradicts them already and they can only hold it up with more speculations. The problem is it lacks a lot of moments that should be fleshed out, it is full of pseudo-existential moment that are torn apart by fans with their theories now even though the answers already are pretty self-explanatory through psychology but I guess I have to accept the way of writing as I always do. Nier 2 is not even half as good but still better than most. Nier 1 is after FFVII my favourite game because of the Gestalt version. I do not really talk about actual story content in shape and form but it might still be too much for some. And Drakengard also does it very different because of timelines and stuff.

Nier 2 is a more extreme version of what happened in the first one's narrative choice. Nier 2 is: 'finish the game at 50% (not really finishing it thus)' - > 'restart and play with another character until you reach the story point again' -> 'after that play the other 50%'.

Nier 1 was 'finish the game' -> 'restart at 50% and you have a bit of extra dialogue to read'. You can see the parallels and can expect something to happen because of past games but it still is very different execution-wise. 'Experience a different view'-wise there are similiarities. It's how it worked in the first Nier Not, it is not.